Emerald Able vs Amanda Rodgers Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. Able vs A. Rodgers

Emerald Able

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

491

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Amanda Rodgers

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

491

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Able 1 - 0 Rodgers

They have played 2 sets in total, with Emerald Able winning 2 and Amanda Rodgers winning 0. The last match between Emerald Able and Amanda Rodgers was at the W25 Osprey, 24-04-2019, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Emerald Able getting the victory 7-5 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Able	1
Rodgers	0

Last H2H Matches:

(Q1) W25 Osprey(04-24-19)

Stats

Emerald Able

Amanda Rodgers

E. Able vs A. Rodgers H2H Profile

E. Able	Stats	A. Rodgers
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
37.04% (30-51)	Career Total W/L	48.82% (124-130)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

E. Able vs A. Rodgers Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emerald Able has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Amanda Rodgers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emerald Able, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Amanda Rodgers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Emerald Able has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Amanda Rodgers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Emerald Able has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Amanda Rodgers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Emerald Able has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Amanda Rodgers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 69/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13).
Player level: In the last year, Emerald Able has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Amanda Rodgers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Emerald Able winning 1 times and Amanda Rodgers being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Emerald Able winning 2 and Amanda Rodgers winning 0. The last match between Emerald Able and Amanda Rodgers was at the W25 Osprey, 24-04-2019, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Emerald Able getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emerald Able has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Amanda Rodgers has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emerald Able has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Amanda Rodgers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Emerald Able has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Amanda Rodgers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Emerald Able vs Amanda Rodgers Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Able vs A. Rodgers H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. Able	Stats	A. Rodgers
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	8
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

E. Able Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W25 Petit-Bourg - 20-01-2020
R1 Jamilah SnellsJ. Snells	L	4-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
Q3 Althea HudsonA. Hudson	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
W15 Fort-de-France - 13-01-2020
R2 Marine PartaudM. Partaud	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
R1 Koralie EtienneK. Etienne	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
W15 Norman - 02-12-2019
R1 Emma DavisE. Davis	L	6-2 3-6 6-1	Stats

View All

A. Rodgers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W25 Osprey - 22-04-2019
Q1 Emerald AbleE. Able	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
W25 Daytona Beach - 14-01-2019
Q3 Anastasia NefedovaA. Nefedova	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Q1 Nagi HanataniN. Hanatani	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
Macon - 22-10-2018
Q1 Andie K. DaniellA. K.	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Florence - 15-10-2018
Q3 Rasheeda McadooR. Mcadoo	L	7-6(4) 6-4	Stats

View All

E. Able vs A. Rodgers Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. Able	Stats	A. Rodgers
37.04% (30/51)	YTD Win/Loss	48.82% (124/130)
38.95% (67/105)	Sets Win/Loss	49.56% (279/284)
45.07% (645/786)	Games Win/Loss	50.73% (2517/2445)
37.21% (16/27)	Hard Win/Loss	48.91% (45/47)
37.84% (14/23)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (69/69)
0.00% (0/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	41.67% (10/14)
0.03	Aces Per Game	0.06
21	Aces Total	150
0.06	Double Faults Per Game	0.09
41	Total Double Faults	211
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
433.74	Average Opponent Rank	489.46
52% (420/811)	1st Serve %	58% (2291/3962)
57% (238/420)	1st Serve Win %	60% (1384/2291)
40% (157/391)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (759/1671)
52% (45/87)	Break Points Won % (Total)	46% (228/501)
43% (350/823)	Return Points Win %	44% (1785/4045)
0% (0/0)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
32.00% (16/34)	Challenger W/L	43.79% (67/86)
45.16% (14/17)	Futures W/L	57.00% (57/43)
36% (29/80)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (124/253)
33% (2/6)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	36% (12/33)
27% (3/11)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (25/56)
88% (32/28)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (131/110)
9% (32/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (131/21)
2% (49/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (123/14)